ECO5079 - Conservação e Coexistência Humano-Fauna

Carga Horária

Docentes responsáveis
Katia Maria Paschoaletto Micchi de Barros Ferraz

Objetivo
1) Resgatar os principais referenciais teóricos que justificam o surgimento e evolução do movimento
conservacionista, destacando sua origem e trajetória, paradigmas, barreiras e perspectivas de futuro; 2)
Ampliar a discussão da conservação rumo à coexistência humano-fauna; 3) Discutir como as abordagens
integrativas, inclusivas, participativas e transdisciplinares podem ajudar a alcançar as metas de
conservação e a coexistência humano-fauna; e 4) Discutir problemas reais de conservação e
coexistência humano-fauna, estimulando o aluno a formular perguntas que norteiem a busca por
soluções práticas e efetivas para a conservação e coexistência humano-fauna.

Conteúdo
1) Histórico da conservação. Movimentos e paradigmas da conservação. Futuro da conservação. 2)
Valores da conservação. 3) Propósitos da conservação. 4) Barreiras e lacunas da conservação. 5)

Dimensões humanas da conservação. Conflito humano-fauna. 6) Coexistência humano-fauna. Interações
humano-fauna. Gestão da coexistência. 7) Transdisciplinaridade e co-produção para a conservação e
coexistência. Pesquisa engajada. Processos participativos para tomada de decisão; 8) Problemas de
conservação e coexistência como casos de estudo.

Bibliografia
Beier, P., Hansen, L. J., Helbrecht, L., Behar, D. 2017. A how‐to guide for coproduction of actionable
science. Conservation Letters 10(3): 288-296.
Bennett, N. J., Roth, R., Klain, .... & Wyborn, C. 2017. Conservation social science: Understanding and
integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biological Conservation 205: 93-108.
Bennett, N. J., Roth, R., Klain, S. C., ... & Verissimo, D. 2017. Mainstreaming the social sciences in
conservation. Conservation Biology 31(1): 56-66.
Brites, A. D., De Mello, K., Tavares, P. A., ... & Sparovek, G. 2021. Science-based Stakeholder Dialogue
for Environmental Policy Implementation. Conservation & Society 19(4): 225-235.
Büscher, B., Fletcher, R. 2019. Towards convivial conservation. Conservation & Society, 17(3), 283-296.
Büscher, B., Fletcher, R. 2020. The Conservation Revolution: radical ideas for saving nature beyond the
Anthropocene. Verso. New York. 216pp.
Büscher, B., Fletcher, R., Brockington, D., ... & Shanker, K. 2017. Half-Earth or Whole Earth? Radical
ideas for conservation, and their implications. Oryx, 51(3), 407-410.
Decker, D. J., Riley, S. J., Siemer, W. F. (Eds.). 2012. Human dimensions of wildlife management. JHU
Press.
Dickman, A. J. 2010. Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively
resolving human–wildlife conflict. Animal conservation, 13(5), 458-466.
Evans, M. 2021. Re-conceptualizing the role(s) of science in biodiversity conservation. Environmental
Conservation 48(3): 151-160.
Ferraz, K. M. P. M. B., Morato, R. G., Bovo, A. A. A., .... & Traylor-Holzer, K. 2020. Bridging the gap
between researchers, conservation planners, and decision makers to improve species conservation
decision-making. Conservation Science and Practice e330.

Frank B., Glikman J.A. 2019. Human-Wildlife conflicts and the need to include coexistence. In: Human-
Wildlife interactions: Turning conflict into coexistence (eds. B. Frank, J.A. Glikman, S. Marchini), 1-19.

(Cambridge University Press).
Glikman, J. A., Frank, B., Ruppert,... & Marchini, S. 2021. Coexisting with different human-wildlife
coexistence perspectives. Frontiers in Conservation Science, 2, 703174.
Green, S. J., Armstrong, J., Bogan, M., ...& Veríssimo, D. 2015. Conservation needs diverse values,
approaches, and practitioners. Conservation Letters 8: 385-387.
Gross E, Jayasinghe N., Brooks A., Polet G., Wadhwa R., Hilderink-Koopmans, F. 2021. A Future for All:
The Need for Human-Wildlife Coexistence. (WWF, Gland, Switzerland).
IUCN. 2020. IUCN SSC Position Statement on the Management of Human-Wildlife Conflict. (IUCN
Species Survival Commission (SSC) Human-Wildlife Conflict Task Force).

IUCN. 2023. IUCN SSC guidelines on human-wildlife conflict and coexistence. First edition. Gland,
Switzerland
Kareiva, P., Marvier, M. 2007. Conservation for the people. Scientific American 50-57.
Kareiva, P., Marvier, M. 2012. What Is Conservation Science? BioScience 62(11): 962-969.
Kareiva, P., Marvier, M., Lalasz, R. 2012. Conservation in the Anthropocene: Beyond Solitude and
Fragility. Breakthrough Journal.
Koenig, H. J., Kiffner, C., Kramer-Schadt, S., Fürst, C., Keuling, O., Ford, A. T. 2020. Human–wildlife
coexistence in a changing world. Conservation Biology 34: 786-794.
Kopnina, H., Washington, H., Gray, J., Taylor, B. 2018. The ‘future of conservation’ debate: Defending
ecocentrism and the Nature Needs Half movement. Biological Conservation 217: 140-148.
Krauss, J. E. 2021. Decolonizing, conviviality and convivial conservation: towards a convivial SDG 15,
life on land? Journal of Political Ecology 28(1).
Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M.,... & Thomas, C. J. 2012. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability
science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability science 7: 25-43.
Mace, G. M. 2014. Whose conservation?. Science 345(6204): 1558-1560.
Mach, K. J., Lemos, M. C., Meadow, A. M.,... & Wong-Parodi, G. 2020. Actionable knowledge and the art
of engagement. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 42: 30-37.
Marchini, S. 2014. Who’s in conflict with whom? Human dimensions of the conflicts involving wildlife. In
L. M. Verdade, M. C. Lyra-Jorge, & C. I. Piña (Eds.), Applied ecology and human dimensions in biological
conservation (pp. 189–209). New York: Springer

Marchini, S. M., Ferraz, K. M. P. M. B., Foster, V., .... & Macdonald, D. W. 2021. Planning for Human-
Wildlife Coexistence: Conceptual Framework, Workshop Process, and a Model for Transdisciplinary

Collaboration. Frontiers in Conservation Science 2: 1-11.
Marchini, S., Ferraz, K. M. P. M. B., Zimmermann, A., ... & Macdonald, D. W. 2019. Planning for
coexistence in a complex human-dominated world. pp. 414–438. In: Human–wildlife interactions:
turning conflict into coexistence (Frank, B., Glikman, J. A., Marchini, S., eds). Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Massarella, K., Nygren, A., Fletcher, R., ... & Percequillo, A. R. 2021. Transformation beyond
conservation: how critical social science can contribute to a radical new agenda in biodiversity
conservation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 49, 79-87.
Max-Neef, M. A. 2005. Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics 53(1): 5-16.
Meine, C. 2010. Conservation Biology: Past and Present. pp.1-13. In: Conservation Biology for All (N. S.
Sodhi e P Ehrlich, eds). Oxford University Press.
Meine, C., Soule, M., Noss, R. F. 2006. ‘A mission-driven discipline’: the growth of conservation biology.
Conservation Biology 20: 631-651.
Milner-Gulland, E. 2021. The global conservation movement is divided but not diverse: Reflections on
2020. Oryx 55(3): 321-322.
Nel, J. L., Roux, D. J., Driver, A., .....& Reyers, B. 2016. Knowledge co‐production and boundary work to
promote implementation of conservation plans. Conservation Biology 30(1): 176-188.
Norris, K., Terry, A., Hansford, J. P., Turvey, S. T. 2020. Biodiversity conservation and the earth system:
mind the gap. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 35(10): 919-926.
Nyhus, P. J. 2016. Human–wildlife conflict and coexistence. Annual Review of Environment and

Resources 41: 143-171.
Rocha, P. L. B., Pardini, R., Viana, B. F., El-Hani, C. N. 2020. Fostering inter-and transdisciplinarity in
discipline-oriented universities to improve sustainability science and practice. Sustainability Science 15:
717-728.
Sandbrook, C. 2015. What is conservation?. Oryx 49(4): 565-566.
Sandbrook, C., Fisher, J. A., Holmes, G., Luque-Lora, R., Keane, A. 2019. The global conservation
movement is diverse but not divided. Nature Sustainability 2(4): 316-323.
Sandroni, L, Ferraz, K. M. P. M. B. 2023. Conservação convivial: explorando conceitos transformadores
para a promoção da (bio)diversidade no Brasil. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente 62: 1498-1527.
Scholz, R. W., Steiner, G. 2015. The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: part I –
theoretical foundations. Sustainability Science 10: 527-544.
Scholz, R. W., Steiner, G. 2015. The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: part II –
what constraints and obstacles do we meet in practice?. Sustainability Science 10(4): 653-671.
Scholz, R. W., Steiner, G. 2015. Transdisciplinarity at the crossroads. Sustainability Science 10(4): 521-
526.
Soulé, M. E. 1985. What is conservation biology?. BioScience 35(11): 727-734.
Sutherland, W. J., Dicks, L. V., Petrovan, S. O., Smith, R. K. 2021. What works in conservation. Open
Book Publisher, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Toomey, A. H., Knight, A. T., & Barlow, J. 2017. Navigating the space between research and
implementation in conservation. Conservation Letters 10(5): 619-625.
Williams, D. R., Balmford, A., Wilcove, D. S. 2020. The past and future role of conservation science in
saving biodiversity. Conservation Letters 13(4): e12720.
Wyborn, C., Davila, F., Pereira, L., ... & Woods, E. 2020. Imagining transformative biodiversity futures.
Nature Sustainability 3(9): 670-672.